The Design Institute of Australia (DIA) has voiced frustration at the NSW government’s decision not to pursue a registration pathway for the state’s interior designers, following a recent parliamentary review of building laws.
In its response to the Legislative Council Public Accountability and Works Committee’s examination of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020, the Government formally “Noted” a recommendation that it consider creating a registration and licensing framework for interior designers. It reiterated its position that interior design work does not fall within the state’s building safety regulatory scheme and should instead be incorporated into documentation prepared by registered architects and building design practitioners.
DIA chief executive Simone LeAmon said the decision overlooked evidence presented during the inquiry. “The Committee heard extensive evidence about the contribution interior designers make to building safety and quality, and made a clear recommendation. It is disappointing that the Government has chosen to note rather than act on that recommendation,” she said.
The DIA argues that other jurisdictions have already demonstrated workable models. In Victoria, the Victorian Building Authority recognises Building Designer, Building Design (Interior) as a registration category. Practitioners must meet qualification and experience thresholds and are authorised to prepare technical drawings and lodge building permit applications.
Several Asia Pacific countries have also moved to formalise the profession. Malaysia regulates interior designers through the Board of Architects Malaysia, while the Philippines established licensure requirements under the Philippine Interior Design Act of 2012. Singapore’s Singapore Interior Design Accreditation Scheme sets accreditation levels tied to qualifications and experience, and Indonesia administers certification through Himpunan Desainer Interior Indonesia.
“When Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Indonesia are all moving to recognise and regulate interior design professionals, it is difficult to understand why New South Wales continues to exclude them from its building practitioner framework,” LeAmon said.
The DIA maintains that a domestic accreditation pathway would better align Australia with emerging regional standards and support professional mobility.
Although the Government has flagged a Building Productivity Reforms package for 2026, the DIA says it will continue to push for interior designers to be included in future consultations. “We acknowledge the government’s commitment to continue working with the interior design industry, and we intend to hold them to that commitment,” LeAmon said.
“The DIA will be seeking a seat at the table for the 2026 building reforms consultation. We will be bringing a detailed proposal for an interior design registration pathway that is proportionate, practical, and aligned with the Government’s own consumer protection and productivity objectives,” LeAmon said.
“Our members are degree-qualified professionals who complete 50 continuing professional development points every year. They are ready to be regulated. The question is whether New South Wales is ready to join Victoria – and our regional neighbours – in recognising them.”
Download the NSW government’s report here.